CopyrightN.D. Cal.5:26-cv-02333

Chicken Soup for the Soul, LLC v. Meta Platforms Inc.

Summary

Chicken Soup for the Soul sues Meta and AI companies for copyright infringement over training data use.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Court
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
Docket no.
5:26-cv-02333
Nature of suit
Copyright
Filed
2026-03-17
Last filing
2026-05-29

Cause

17:501 Copyright Infringement

Parties

Cognella, Inc. NVIDIA Corporation Apple, Inc. Perplexity AI, Inc. xAI Corporation Meta Platforms Inc. OpenAI Holdings LLC OAI Corporation LLC OpenAI Global LLC OpenAI GP LLC OpenAI OPCO LLC OpenAI, Inc. Google LLC Anthropic PBC Chicken Soup for the Soul, LLC

Deep summary (AI brief of the complaint)

# Litigation Brief: Chicken Soup for the Soul, LLC v. Meta Platforms Inc. et al. **Plaintiff:** Chicken Soup for the Soul, LLC, owner of the *Chicken Soup for the Soul* nonfiction book franchise (500+ million copies sold since 1993). **Defendant:** Meta Platforms, Inc.; Anthropic PBC; Google LLC; OpenAI, Inc. and affiliated entities (6); xAI Corporation; Perplexity AI, Inc.; Apple Inc.; and NVIDIA Corporation (13 defendants total). **Core allegation:** Defendants downloaded pirated copies of Plaintiff's copyrighted books from shadow-library repositories (LibGen, Z-Library, The Pile/Books3, Anna's Archive) without authorization and used those copies to train and/or optimize their commercial LLMs. Each act of ingestion, preprocessing, and iterative training constituted a separate unlicensed reproduction in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 501. **Asserted IP:** - Copyrighted works comprising the *Chicken Soup for the Soul* book series (hundreds of titles; specific registration numbers not stated in the extracted text) - Works sourced from pirated corpora: Books3 (~200,000 books from Bibliotik), LibGen, Z-Library, Anna's Archive, and The Pile **Relief sought:** Damages (including statutory damages up to $150,000/work for willful infringement), permanent injunction, and all additional available remedies. **Why it matters:** This suit is one of the most expansive AI training-data copyright actions filed to date, naming every major frontier-model developer simultaneously and seeking individualized (non-class) statutory damages—directly challenging the adequacy of the ~$3,000-per-work class-action settlement framework recently preliminarily approved against Anthropic in a parallel N.D. Cal. proceeding.

AI-generated from the filed complaint. Always verify against the original document.

View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-05-29