CopyrightS.D. Cal.3:26-cv-02390

Powers v. Disney/The Walt Disney Corporation

Summary

Christin Noel Powers sues Disney and multiple filmmakers for copyright infringement related to an animated film.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Court
U.S. District Court, Southern District of California
Docket no.
3:26-cv-02390
Nature of suit
Copyright
Filed
2026-04-15
Last filing
2026-05-18

Cause

17:0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)

Parties

Robert Iger Jennifer Coleman Jared Bush Jonathan Groff Kristen Bell Idina Menzel Jennifer Lee Chris Buck Peter Delvecho Walt Disney Animation Disney/The Walt Disney Corporation Christin Noel Powers

Deep summary (AI brief of the complaint)

# Brief: Powers v. Disney/The Walt Disney Corporation **Plaintiff:** Christy Noel Powers (pro se), Southern District of California **Defendant:** The Walt Disney Corporation / Walt Disney Animation, and named individual producers, cast members, and executives including Idina Menzel, Josh Gad, Jonathan Groff, and others **Core allegation:** Plaintiff alleges Disney stole her intellectual property and copyrighted content, asserting the concept/story of *Frozen* originated from her creative work disclosed as early as December 1, 1974 (her stated birthdate) through unspecified submissions; she claims ongoing infringement since at least 2012 through the present. **Asserted IP:** - Unregistered/unspecified copyright in creative content predating *Frozen* (2013) - Referenced prior registered work: registration no. 13/8/11 (not a standard U.S. copyright registration number; likely garbled) - Notarized letter sent to Disney circa April 4, 2012 - Prior related filings referencing *Frozen* and a "Writ of Mandamus" (January 2014–2016 dockets) **Relief sought:** Monetary damages equal to Disney's total net worth ($130B asserted), plus equitable relief for plaintiff's financial and housing hardship **Why it matters:** Not stated — complaint presents no cognizable legal theory or registered IP with particularity; case appears to be a pro se serial filing with significant procedural history of prior dismissals across multiple courts.

AI-generated from the filed complaint. Always verify against the original document.

View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-05-19