TrademarkC.D. Cal.2:26-cv-03354

Maren Flagg v. Taylor Swift

Summary

Maren Flagg sues Taylor Swift for trademark infringement in federal court.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityMismatch

Prior 22P · 199D · 90NRecent 30d 0P · 19D · 3N

Latest ruling: plaintiff (2026-05-26)

Court
U.S. District Court, Central District of California
Docket no.
2:26-cv-03354
Nature of suit
Trademark
Filed
2026-03-30
Last filing
2026-06-30

Cause

15:1114 Trademark Infringement

Deep summary (AI brief of the complaint)

# Litigation Brief: Flagg v. Swift et al. **Case No. 2:26-cv-03354 (C.D. Cal., filed Mar. 30, 2026)** --- **Plaintiff:** Maren Flagg (a/k/a Maren Wade), individual, Nevada resident; singer, songwriter, comedian, and writer. **Defendant:** Taylor Swift (individual); TAS Rights Management, LLC (TN); UMG Recordings, Inc. (DE/Santa Monica); Bravado International Group Merchandising Services Inc. (CA/Santa Monica). **Core allegation:** Plaintiff owns incontestable federal trademark Registration No. 4,800,625 for CONFESSIONS OF A SHOWGIRL (Cl. 41, entertainment services), in continuous use since 2014. Beginning in August 2025, Defendants adopted THE LIFE OF A SHOWGIRL as a source-identifying designation on a coordinated line of consumer merchandise, despite a USPTO refusal of their own application on likelihood-of-confusion grounds, constituting reverse confusion trademark infringement under the Lanham Act. **Asserted IP:** - U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 4,800,625 — CONFESSIONS OF A SHOWGIRL (Int'l Class 41; incontestable status under 15 U.S.C. § 1065) **Relief sought:** Injunctive relief, damages, and statewide/nationwide relief; jury trial demanded (specific monetary amounts not yet pleaded in extracted text). **Why it matters:** The case tests the reverse-confusion doctrine against one of the most aggressive trademark-enforcing entertainers in the industry, and the USPTO's pre-litigation refusal of Defendants' own application gives Plaintiff an unusually strong actual-notice argument.

AI-generated from the filed complaint. Always verify against the original document.

View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-07-01