CopyrightC.D. Cal.2:26-cv-01235

Spyglass Media Group LLC v. The Alterian Ghost Factory, Inc. d/b/a Alterian, Inc.

Summary

Spyglass Media sues Alterian over copyright infringement regarding film or media intellectual property rights.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Court
U.S. District Court, Central District of California
Docket no.
2:26-cv-01235
Nature of suit
Copyright
Filed
2026-02-06
Last filing
2026-05-13

Cause

28:2201 Declaratory Judgment

Parties

Does The Alterian Ghost Factory, Inc. Paramount Pictures Corporation Spyglass Media Group LLC

Deep summary (AI brief of the complaint)

# Case Brief: Spyglass Media Group LLC v. The Alterian Ghost Factory, Inc. **Case No. 2:26-cv-1235 (C.D. Cal., filed Feb. 6, 2026)** --- **Plaintiff:** Spyglass Media Group, LLC (producer/co-financier) and Paramount Pictures Corporation (distributor/co-financier) of the *Scream* franchise. **Defendant:** The Alterian Ghost Factory, Inc. d/b/a Alterian, Inc., a California special-effects and creature-design company based in Irwindale, CA. **Core allegation:** Alterian, despite knowing for decades that Fun World licensed the "Ghostface" mask for the *Scream* franchise, waited thirty years before threatening litigation—timed to extort a multi-million-dollar payment weeks before *Scream 7*'s February 25/27, 2026 theatrical release. Plaintiffs seek a judicial declaration that Alterian holds no enforceable copyright in the Ghostface mask and that laches and the statute of limitations bar any equitable relief. **Asserted IP:** - Alterian's claimed copyright in the "Wailer" mask design (no registration number stated) - Fun World's asserted independent copyright in the Ghostface mask design (no registration number stated) **Relief sought:** Declaratory judgment that Alterian has no cognizable copyright rights in the Ghostface mask and that equitable relief is foreclosed by laches and the statute of limitations. **Why it matters:** The case tests whether a rights claimant can weaponize a last-minute copyright threat to extract a nuisance settlement against a major studio franchise on the eve of a wide theatrical release—a tactic with direct implications for how courts apply *Petrella*'s "extraordinary circumstances" laches carve-out in the entertainment industry.

AI-generated from the filed complaint. Always verify against the original document.

View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-05-13